Hi Sean, can you explain what you mean by „data ownership“? Thank you! A cooperation agreement can be a highly specialized research award in which federal employees are among the relatively few experts in this field. In this case, the award can be defined as a „cooperation agreement“ because federal staff and the non-federal recipient will conduct the research together in one way or another. „A contract is a promise or set of promises for the breach of which the law grants a remedy or the fulfillment of which is in any way recognized by law as a duty.“ Reprocessing (second) of contracts §1 (1981) Here is for example a cooperation agreement of the Geological Survey (USGS) of the Ministry of the Interior. This is a funding opportunity for joint research and technical assistance, which is granted in the form of a cooperation agreement and not a grant. The winner will work closely with USGS staff and researchers to enhance powerful scientific skills in computation and visualization through the exploration of new tools, methods, and techniques for large-scale scientific data management. Will websites funded in whole or in part through grants or cooperation agreements be subject to the requirements of FISMA, section 508 of the Data Protection Act and the related OMB memorandum, such as OMB Memo M-17-06? Beneficiaries of a cooperation agreement must apply for and obtain prior authorization to hold a conference. This may impact research activities, including proposed working group meetings, roundtables and focus groups that meet the definition of a „conference“ under DOJ policy. See „Conference Approval, Planning and Reporting“ in the JUP Financial Guide. The Federal Grant and Cooperation Agreements Act of 1977 (P.L. 95-224, 31 USC 6301 et seq.) makes the fundamental distinctions between supply contracts, grants, and cooperation agreements. Main conclusions 1. Grants and cooperation agreements are very similar. 2.

The differences lie in the details of implementation (i.e. cooperation agreements are accompanied by „significant participation“ by the Federal Agency). 3. There are also legal implications of these various agreements, so read the agreements carefully and discuss them with lawyers. Hi Dave, yes, they can be. But it really depends on the specific funding opportunity – which is the main purpose of the grant. As long as the grant achieves this goal, funding can support a 508-compliant website, in whole or in part. If you have any further questions, we recommend that you contact the funding body of the respective grant or cooperation agreement, as we are not able to provide decisive answers to this question. The NIJ may choose to provide discretionary grants in the form of grants or cooperation agreements. Although many of you are familiar with grants, you may not be as familiar with cooperation agreements. Cooperation agreements are just another way to support high-quality crime and justice research. The cooperation agreements allow us to fully exploit the expertise of NIJ scientists and support innovative research.

The following table shows some of the key differences and similarities between these two financing options. On Grants.gov, of course, we have government grants, but you will also find many „cooperation agreements“ while looking for funding opportunities. This is because cooperation agreements and subsidies are very similar, but with a big difference. Both cooperation agreements and grants „transfer anything of value from the federal contracting authority or transmitting agency to the non-federal body in order to fulfill a public purpose.“ Suppliers and recipients enter into binding relationships with the government – and they are required to comply with the terms of the supply contract or financial support. A cooperation agreement „differs from financial assistance in that it provides for substantial participation between the federal procurement agency or transit agency and the non-federal agency in carrying out the activity set out in the federal award.“ Now the question arises as to what a „substantial involvement“ of the federal government entails. In the case of grants, no significant participation between the NIJ and the winner is to be expected. The recipient is required to work with the assigned NIJ Grant Manager, who is the authorized representative of the NIJ responsible for ensuring the proper administration of the grant. Should the Fellow also decide to seek NIJ scientists` advice and guidance on substantive issues related to the grant (e.B.

Examination of instruments, translation of results in the field, suggestion of places of publication), the fellow can access NIJ scientists at no cost to the fellow. In the legal sense, financial support and the award of acquisitions are types of contracts: cooperation agreements and grants are „a legal instrument of financial support between a federal donor or transit agency and a non-federal body“ within the meaning of the OMB Uniform Guidelines (§ 200.24 for the cooperation agreement and § 200.51 for the grant agreement). A cooperation agreement is a type of project in which joint action or cooperation between the federal donor and the recipient during the implementation of the project is deemed necessary or desirable to ensure the successful implementation of the project. For cooperation agreements, significant participation between the NIJ and the winner is expected. The recipient is required to work with the assigned NIJ Grant Manager, who is the authorized representative of the NIJ responsible for the proper administration of the scholarship. In addition, a NIJ scientist is responsible for working with the laureate`s researchers on key issues related to the award – support, guidance, coordination and participation in project activities to ensure success. The NIJ scientist may also publish and present himself with the beneficiary`s researchers as representatives of the NIJ. In general, the term „substantial participation“ refers to the extent to which federal employees directly perform or implement portions of the scholarship program.

In the case of a grant, the federal government maintains a stricter monitoring and surveillance function. In a cooperative arrangement, federal employees are then more involved in the implementation of the program. When you read „cooperative,“ don`t forget to work „side by side.“ The specific way in which this participation is integrated varies depending on the programme and the agency. Federal agencies use procurement contracts and various forms of financial support (grants, cooperation agreements and others) to transfer funds to individuals and organizations to accomplish the organization`s authorized mission. An executive agency uses a grant agreement as a legal instrument that reflects a relationship between the U.S. government and a state, local government, or other recipient if, despite this limitation, cooperation agreements are an intriguing financing tool that entrepreneurs, as well as state and local governments, should oversee to find a new way to contract with the federal government. Complete.. .